Saturday, August 20, 2016

Equal Access to Pools

     At the beginning of summer, I realized I didn't know where a community pool was near where I lived. Throughout my commutes to and from work I would think about this as I passed various neighborhoods with their own pool houses and the YMCA with an indoor pool. I kept wondering where the city's public pool was. The more I thought about it, the more I started wondering when neighborhoods started building their own pools and whether it was a suburban thing, as I don't remember seeing such private pools in the smaller town I grew up in. I thought about the divisive nature of these private pools, how they allowed those who could afford in such neighborhoods to insulate themselves from those different from them, and how those different people were more likely to be black or Hispanic.
     With the recent success of Simone Manuel at the Summer Games in Rio and the discussion of racial segregation at the pool, I've started thinking about this topic again. Finally doing some research into the subject I wasn't surprised by what I found. Prior to the 1950s private pools were very rare but were generally racially as well as gender segregated. Shortly after the mid-century point, communities started to allow men and women to swim together, but insisted on separate facilities for black people. In some places the racial division was done through the laws, which were eventually challenged, while other places allowed its residents to enforce unofficial segregationist policies while looking the other way during the violent encounters that ensued.
     As the civil rights movement gained momentum and courts overturned the laws keeping pools racially separated, more and more pools were built on private lands in ways that mirrored white flight out of the cities and into the suburbs. Some of them were back yard pools, but many were behind the gates of country clubs and neighborhood associations. This privatization of pools allowed their users to maintain a homogeneous group of users without running afoul of the law. In a few cases, the move from public to private occurred to the same pool. Cities that owned and operated the pools and who were in support of segregation would sell their pool to private organizations who would continue to restrict access based on race.
     This divestment of public interest in pools has had a lasting effect for poor and disadvantaged groups. The number of public pools per capita is smaller than it was 60 years ago, and those that do exist are often in whiter middle class parts of town making it more difficult for those less well off to access them. The diminished access helps explain the large number of black and Hispanic children who don't know how to swim – they simply do not have anywhere to learn.
     Simone Manuel winning gold medals for swimming is certainly a seminal moment in US history, but her success does not mark the end of racially motivated policies in America. We still have plenty of work to do if we believe it important that all children should have the ability to learn to swim and enjoy a hot summer day in the pool. Perhaps a move back to community or city pools can provide a place where people can come together and recognize the humanity and fundamental sameness in one another rather than fear each others' differences in ways that play out on city streets where cops disproportionately respond to black citizens with violence and targeted communities react with riots.

Sources:


No comments:

Post a Comment